Comments on: Quicksilver http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver what comes next? Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:25:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: uacooking http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-415397 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:43:33 +0000 http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-415397 QuickSilver developer is planning on using the Spotlight API in future releases of QuickSilver. QuickSilver developer is planning on using the Spotlight API in future releases of QuickSilver.

]]> by: 2412a60a1c3e http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-286358 Wed, 14 May 2008 15:41:42 +0000 http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-286358 <strong>2412a60a1c3e...</strong> 2412a60a1c3e07bf3549... 2412a60a1c3e…

2412a60a1c3e07bf3549…

]]> by: Eric http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-1703 Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:35:38 +0000 http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-1703 And I have to disagree with your comments on Watson and Konfabulator. The differences between Watson, Sherlock, Konfabulator and Dashboard have been endlessly debated. I feel that if a developer has something groundbreaking, they should look into a patent. I paid for Konfabulator but eventually found that it offered little functionality while using plenty of resources. This mentality supports the idea that Apple should have never made iMovie, iTunes or any application for the matter. I like that Apple pushes developers to be creative. In the end, I will use the application that meets my needs. And I have to disagree with your comments on Watson and Konfabulator. The differences between Watson, Sherlock, Konfabulator and Dashboard have been endlessly debated. I feel that if a developer has something groundbreaking, they should look into a patent. I paid for Konfabulator but eventually found that it offered little functionality while using plenty of resources. This mentality supports the idea that Apple should have never made iMovie, iTunes or any application for the matter. I like that Apple pushes developers to be creative. In the end, I will use the application that meets my needs.

]]> by: Matt Croydon http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-1613 Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:45:45 +0000 http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-1613 Hey thanks for the heads up, Simon. Spotlight had slipped my mind. Speaking of stuff baked in to the OS, I don't think I'd be able to function without Expose on the Mac. It's really handy. Hey thanks for the heads up, Simon. Spotlight had slipped my mind. Speaking of stuff baked in to the OS, I don’t think I’d be able to function without Expose on the Mac. It’s really handy.

]]> by: Simon Willison http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-1612 Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:49:25 +0000 http://www.postneo.com/2005/03/05/quicksilver#comment-1612 I've got to disagree on that one. QuickSilver indexes your applications, address book and files in the folders you specify, all by name only. Spotlight (in OS X 10.4) does a full-text index of every file on your hard drive - and exposes the results as an API as well as an application. In fact, the QuickSilver developer is planning on using the Spotlight API in future releases of QuickSilver. I’ve got to disagree on that one. QuickSilver indexes your applications, address book and files in the folders you specify, all by name only. Spotlight (in OS X 10.4) does a full-text index of every file on your hard drive - and exposes the results as an API as well as an application. In fact, the QuickSilver developer is planning on using the Spotlight API in future releases of QuickSilver.

]]>