<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax for the Sake of Ajax?</title>
	<link>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax</link>
	<description>what comes next?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jamil</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-396292</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-396292</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jamil...&lt;/strong&gt;

an interesting take on a boring subject....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jamil&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>an interesting take on a boring subject&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-396231</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-396231</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kelsey...&lt;/strong&gt;

kinda makes you wonder....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kelsey&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>kinda makes you wonder&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Keanu</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-396216</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-396216</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keanu...&lt;/strong&gt;

once again you outdid myself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keanu&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>once again you outdid myself&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-7398</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-7398</guid>
					<description>"Ajax is the new Flash "

I've been seeing DHTML, um, remote scripting, I mean AJAX as the new Java applet.  

Variations on evolving technology still require the developer to have some design taste.  Which, sadly, is not evolving quite as fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ajax is the new Flash &#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been seeing DHTML, um, remote scripting, I mean AJAX as the new Java applet.  </p>
<p>Variations on evolving technology still require the developer to have some design taste.  Which, sadly, is not evolving quite as fast.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: M</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-7391</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 22:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-7391</guid>
					<description>"weather it’s appropriate or not"

Don't mean to pick on you but the word weather is not appropriate in that use.  You probably meant :

"whether it’s appropriate or not"

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;weather it’s appropriate or not&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t mean to pick on you but the word weather is not appropriate in that use.  You probably meant :</p>
<p>&#8220;whether it’s appropriate or not&#8221;</p>
<p>:-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dagur</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-7361</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2005/09/04/ajax-for-the-sake-of-ajax#comment-7361</guid>
					<description>I'll agree that it's unusable and that Ajax is the new Flash but I don't think Ajax is to blame in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree that it&#8217;s unusable and that Ajax is the new Flash but I don&#8217;t think Ajax is to blame in this case.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
