<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symbian: Quietly outperforming RAZRs and iPods</title>
	<link>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods</link>
	<description>what comes next?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Free iPods</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-368298</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-368298</guid>
					<description>So you want the HOTTEST techno gizmo but dont feel like shelling out the dough. You deserve to get freebies. Want Free Things has the top freebies from free Nintendo wii to free electronics such as a free camera, free iPod or free iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want the HOTTEST techno gizmo but dont feel like shelling out the dough. You deserve to get freebies. Want Free Things has the top freebies from free Nintendo wii to free electronics such as a free camera, free iPod or free iPhone.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: oakley half jacket</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-90316</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-90316</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;oakley half jacket...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hi. Very nice blog. I\'ve been reading your other entries all day long..lol....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>oakley half jacket&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hi. Very nice blog. I\&#8217;ve been reading your other entries all day long..lol&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: B ill</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-29483</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-29483</guid>
					<description>Honestly, whu cares?? You are a nerd. Also, do any of these devices run linux?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, whu cares?? You are a nerd. Also, do any of these devices run linux?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dean Bubley</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-19508</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 06:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-19508</guid>
					<description>On the other hand, if you were going to compare apples with apples, might it not be worth going back to cumulative shipments of the last major rev of Motorola's embedded featurephone platform software? 

(I forget what it's called, but it's been roughly the same OS since the launch of the V600 &#38; brethren, up to the current RAZR range)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, if you were going to compare apples with apples, might it not be worth going back to cumulative shipments of the last major rev of Motorola&#8217;s embedded featurephone platform software? </p>
<p>(I forget what it&#8217;s called, but it&#8217;s been roughly the same OS since the launch of the V600 &amp; brethren, up to the current RAZR range)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-19477</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 23:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-19477</guid>
					<description>I suspect that's not just one RAZR though. That's likely to be the v3, v3i, v3x and all the colours of the above at the very least. In the same way that the iPod is gen's 1-5   mini   nano   shuffle. Good point though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that&#8217;s not just one RAZR though. That&#8217;s likely to be the v3, v3i, v3x and all the colours of the above at the very least. In the same way that the iPod is gen&#8217;s 1-5   mini   nano   shuffle. Good point though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: raddedas</title>
		<link>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-19453</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.postneo.com/2006/07/02/symbian-quietly-outperforming-razrs-and-ipods#comment-19453</guid>
					<description>Very interesting - but I think if you made your stats a little more comparable the picture would not look quite the same.  In the period since the RAZR was launched 100 Symbian devices have cumulatively outsold the Razr by a couple of million units - impressive, but not quite as world conquering as a skim read of your post suggests.  Stating that the Symbian figures are cumulative would bea  good start...

More detail and speculation: http://techype.blogspot.com/2006/07/if-only-good-mobile-stats-existed.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting - but I think if you made your stats a little more comparable the picture would not look quite the same.  In the period since the RAZR was launched 100 Symbian devices have cumulatively outsold the Razr by a couple of million units - impressive, but not quite as world conquering as a skim read of your post suggests.  Stating that the Symbian figures are cumulative would bea  good start&#8230;</p>
<p>More detail and speculation: <a href="http://techype.blogspot.com/2006/07/if-only-good-mobile-stats-existed.html" rel="nofollow">http://techype.blogspot.com/2006/07/if-only-good-mobile-stats-existed.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
